Pricing
Plans
You pay for one hearing of the panel and receive report with a verdict, findings, action items and an authenticity seal. The higher the plan, the more critics, the deeper the procedure and the more case material we accept.
The first verdict is free
We run your first hearing at our own cost: three critics, the same procedure, the same fact-checking. It ends with the verdict — APPROVE, REVISE or REJECT — and with it the single most dangerous assumption behind your decision and the first check worth doing before the irreversible step. The report explaining it — what the critics found, how serious it is, what to do — are already written and sealed; unlocking them costs 15 € — half the price of a hearing. You pay only if the verdict looks worth the detail.
The report waits 7 days for your decision: the bot reminds you a day before the deadline, then we delete them along with the case materials. Holding someone else's documents indefinitely, in case they decide one day, is not something we consider right.
Early access: the service is open and access is granted instantly. The buttons open the bot — no registration and no waiting for approval. The first verdict is free; the service is young and we collect feedback on every case.
where we suggest you start
Check a decision
Panel
30 € / $30
1 hearing
Three critics for your situation — the other side of the deal, a domain expert, a financier — arguing with each other, with a risk map and background research. A contested fact is flagged, not re-argued; the decision-bias reviewer starts with the Full panel.
Buy in the bot≈ 1580 ⭐ in Telegram Stars
when the decision is irreversible
Check a decision you cannot undo
Full panel
90 € / $90
1 hearing
Seven critics, a full round of debate and a decision-bias reviewer: it looks not at the decision but at how it was made. The main risk is traced along “causes — event — consequences”, a contested fact goes back for a recheck. Up to 5 documents, your own expert.
Buy in the bot≈ 4740 ⭐ in Telegram Stars
Compare the options and choose
Premium
250 € / $250
1 hearing
The same seven critics on the top tier of both providers’ line-ups, with a double procedure: first each critic scores the decision independently, so the first opinion sets no tone, then they argue aloud. Two rounds of intake, priority, 180 days of follow-up. One hearing only.
Buy in the bot≈ 13160 ⭐ in Telegram Stars
A hearing for a company
Special matter
from 1 200 € / $1 200
by contract
A series of hearings on one matter: 7 critics, up to 80 pages, a year of follow-up, the founder personally involved. Not sold by a button — arranged by contract after a conversation.
No button: first a conversation, then an estimate and a contract.
What each plan includes
The full table of rights: the numbers come straight from the service configuration, so they cannot drift from reality. Below the table — what each term means in practice.
| Right | Panel | Full panel | Premium | Special matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critics on the panel Independent roles attacking the decision, beyond the one who runs the session. | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Decision-bias reviewer Looks not at the decision but at how it was made: anchoring, sunk cost, confirmation bias in the record — not personality traits. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| Debate Critics clash with each other after their statements. | yes | full round | full round | full round |
| Independent scoring before the debate Each critic scores blind, then they argue aloud. | — | — | 2 | 3 |
| Rounds of intake How many times the panel comes back with questions before the review. | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Options when you have no decision yet Arrive with a situation and the panel puts two to four genuinely different options on the table; you pick one, and that one gets attacked. | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Every option examined and compared One and the same panel goes through each draft separately; the report shows what held up against what. | — | — | 3 | 5 |
| Your own expert on request You name a role — we seat it on the panel. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| Panel edits How many times the assembled panel can be reshuffled. | — | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| External facts and fact review External facts with sources are gathered before the panel sits, and before printing the report is checked by a model from the other provider with live search. The critics themselves do not browse: eight of them would search for the same thing eight times over. | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Role-specific research Public data on the subject gathered before intake. | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Documents per case Files: PDF, DOCX, photos, screenshots, spreadsheets. | 3 | 5 | 8 | 40 |
| A4 pages in total Total volume: PDFs by page, everything else at 1,800 characters. | 10 | 20 | 30 | 80 |
| XLSX spreadsheets Excel is read row by row: up to 3 sheets, head and tail of each. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| Risk map What can go wrong, with likelihood and price. | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Main-risk breakdown The “causes — event — consequences” chain with barriers. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| A SECOND round on a contested fact Fact review runs in every hearing, the free one included. This is different: if a fact does not hold up, the panel takes a recess and works it through again instead of simply striking it. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| Panel dossiers appended Who these critics are and why they were invited. | — | yes | yes | yes |
| Top models of both vendors The senior models of each line, not the workhorses: the list is reconciled with vendor pricing daily. | — | — | yes | yes |
| Voice You dictate, the panel replies by voice. | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Voice per day How much speech we transcribe and speak back in a day: “voice included” and “ten minutes of voice” are different promises. | 10 min | 20 min | 40 min | 60 min |
| Free questions to the panel How many times you can ask about the service and the case before a hearing opens. | 8 | 15 | 25 | 40 |
| Case volume How much of your text reaches each critic: the description, intake answers, transcribed attachments. | 60k | 200k | 400k | 900k |
| Follow-up after the verdict, days We come back to the case and remind about the action items. | — | 90 | 180 | 365 |
| Priority in the queue Your hearing runs even when daily capacity is spent. | — | yes | yes | yes |
What all of this means
How the panel is assembled
The panel is assembled for YOUR case rather than taken off a shelf. After the intake we name the roles — “the other side of the deal”, “a domain expert”, “a financier”, “a corporate-disputes lawyer” — and shows them to you before the hearing: who was invited and why. You do not have to study the roles or pick the critics — the panel is already assembled; all we need from you is “go ahead”. Adjusting it in plain words is available on the plans that list a number of line-up edits above. Each critic gets a dossier and a distinct set of analytical lenses from the “O-18” method, distributed without repeats.
What “critics on different vendors’ engines” means
Part of the panel runs on Anthropic models, part on OpenAI models. That is the core of the method, not a technical detail: two independent systems err differently, and agreement between them is a stronger signal than confidence from one. Model names are not printed in the report.
What counts as a document and an A4 page
A document is one file you send: a PDF contract, an XLSX sheet, a screenshot, a photo of a page. An A4 page is the unit of volume: PDFs count by page, everything else at 1,800 characters. Two caps are needed because ten screenshots and one hundred-page contract are different work. If a file does not fit, we say so BEFORE attaching it to the case.
Your own expert on request
You name who is missing (“I need someone on transfer pricing”), we clarify the task with one question, builds a dossier and shows it to you before the hearing. The guest takes a seat on the panel rather than being added on top of the plan. We never impersonate a real living person.
The decision-bias reviewer
Takes part in every hearing on every plan, including the free first one. The analyst examines not the decision but how you arrived at it: where the wording shows signs of confirmation-seeking, sunk cost, or the first-opinion effect. The wording is honest — “signs are visible”, not “we measured”: measuring biases without standardized tasks is impossible, and we do not promise it.
Debate and the full round
After the statements the critics clash on the points where they disagree — a separate stage, not a recap. “Full round” means the argument runs until positions are exhausted and the synthesis is reviewed by the second vendor. On the recommended plan there is debate but no second round: a contested fact is flagged and stays contested.
Independent scoring before the debate
Two rounds on Premium, three in a Special case. Each critic first scores the decision without seeing the others, and only then the open argument starts. This defuses the first-opinion effect: in an ordinary discussion whoever speaks first sets the frame for everyone else.
Rounds of intake
Intake is the clarifying questions asked before the review. One round — 3–5 questions and off we go. Two rounds (Premium) and three (Special case) — the panel comes back with new questions after your answers until the picture is complete.
Recheck of a contested fact
If a critic relies on a fact that does not hold up, the hearing takes a recess: the fact is checked separately with live web search and that round runs again. On the lower plan such a fact is simply flagged as unverified — which is more honest than passing it off as established.
Follow-up after the verdict
We come back to your case after the hearing: we remind you of the action items with their check dates and ask what has changed. 90 days on the Full panel, 180 on Premium. This is not a newsletter — it is contact about one specific decision.
What you get in the end
The Decision Review Report: the panel with justification, case materials, statements, debate, a roll-call vote, the verdict (APPROVE / REVISE / REJECT), action items with dates and a SHA-256 seal. One file is issued — the PDF — and the document has no other form: a printout or copied text carries are not the original. Authenticity is checked by attaching the file on the verification page. The report reaches you in the bot within 24 hours of your answering the intake questions questions — usually much sooner.
What no plan includes
We do not give legal, financial or investment opinions, we do not take the decision for you and we do not guarantee the outcome. Verdicts are produced by language models; a contested fact is flagged, not presented as truth.
Guarantee: no objections — no charge
If on your first payment the panel finds no material objection, we refund the full amount. The first hearing carries no charge anyway, so the guarantee is tied to the payment, not to the hearing number. A material objection is a finding marked “critical” or “high”, or a directive from the “Resolved” section. Findings of “medium” and “low” importance, clarifying questions and requests for further documents do not count.
The number of material objections is counted by software and printed inside the report — you do not have to recount anything or take our word for it. The deadline is 7 days from issue. Full rule — section 9 of the agreement.
How to pay
With Telegram Stars — right in the bot, from the plan card. Apple App Store and Google Play rules — and through them Telegram’s — require digital goods inside the messenger to be sold for Stars only. An honest warning: Stars bought in the App Store or Google Play cost about a third above face value.
By card — an invoice from lava.top. Cheaper than Stars: no store markup. Pick a plan in the bot, we will ask which currency to invoice in (euro, US dollars or roubles) and send the link. A currency invoice is payable by international card, Apple Pay, PayPal and local methods (SEPA, iDEAL, Bizum, MB WAY, PIX, Bancontact); roubles go through a Russian card or SBP. Each currency has its own price rather than a daily-rate conversion. The platform does not accept cryptocurrency. The invoice needs an email address — the platform requires it, we do not.
A question about payment or a refund — the /paysupport command in the bot. Support answers from the facts of your payment; anything contested goes to the owner.
Need an invoice for a company, or closing documents — write to the bot and we will issue them. There is no automation for this: the paperwork is prepared by hand, so tell us before you pay rather than after.